• Graduate Program
    • Why study Business Data Science?
    • Program outline
    • Courses
    • Course registration
    • Admissions
    • Facilities
      • Student Offices
      • Location
      • Housing
      • Student Council
  • Research
  • News
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events archive
    • Summer School
      • Deep Learning
      • Econometrics and Data Science Methods for Business and Economics and Finance
      • Foundations of Data Analysis and Machine Learning in Python
      • Introduction to Genome-Wide Data Analysis
      • Tinbergen Institute Summer School Program
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
Home | Events Archive | How Does Expressing Humility Affect Female Leaders? Role of Supervisors’ Gender

How Does Expressing Humility Affect Female Leaders? Role of Supervisors’ Gender

  • Speaker
    Chad Chiu (University of South Australia)
  • Field
  • Location
    University of Amsterdam, Plantage Muidergracht 12, M-building
  • Date and time

    February 04, 2020
    13:00 - 14:00

Does showing humility generate positive outcomes for female leaders? On the one hand, from the gender-role congruence perspective, the expression humility matches observers’ expectation of a female leader’s communal quality and thus amplifies her leadership influence. On the other, the agency-community model suggests that humility might hurts her agentic expression, which in turn degrades others’ judgments on her leadership capability. To address these seemingly contradicted viewpoints, we differentiate leadership outcomes into leadership effectiveness (e.g., bringing positive influence on others) and leadership impression (i.e., whether an individual is seen as a “qualified leader”). We argue that for a female leader, expressing humility would improve her leadership effectiveness in coaching followers and promote their satisfaction at work. However, being humble could hurt her supervisors’ impression about her leadership capability, especially in the eyes of male supervisors. We conduct three empirical studies (experiment, scenario manipulation, and survey) to test our hypotheses and conclude that (1) humble (vs non-humble) female leaders have a greater positive impact on followers’ received coaching and satisfaction (2) male supervisors (vs female supervisors) will give a humble female leader a lower leadership impression rating on her promotability through a lowered perceived leadership competence. The research conclusion should bring important insights and suggestions for improving leadership development and assessment programs in organizations.